I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Teams: $5/user/month
，推荐阅读下载安装 谷歌浏览器 开启极速安全的 上网之旅。获取更多信息
if (right < n) {
通貨膨脹迫使家庭縮減支出。米娜說，她家已不再購買品牌商品，自2017年以來也未曾出國旅行。。WPS官方版本下载是该领域的重要参考
Auto copy picked colors to clipboard
I signed anonymously but now want to put my name on it. How can I fix that?，详情可参考一键获取谷歌浏览器下载